Archive for September, 2009

Financial Planning With Obamanomics

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

This is a review from Financial Planning Magazine’s online site www.financial-planning.com:

The Audacity of Help
Bookshelf
By Paul Menchaca
October 1, 2009

THE AUDACITY OF HELP:

Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America

John F. Wasik; Bloomberg Press; $16.95

“Why did the American people entrust an unknown, not-quite one-term senator from Chicago with the highest office in the land?” asks John F. Wasik in the introduction to his new book, The Audacity of Help. Wasik, a columnist for Bloomberg News and the author of 12 books, examines what he calls Obama’s “Green Deal”—or the spiritual heir to the New Deal—that aims to create jobs, expand healthcare, improve environmental protection and rebuild the country’s sagging energy infrastructure.

If Obama’s plan succeeds, he’ll revive “social capitalism,” Wasik writes, blending humanistic service, pragmatic government supervision and free-market principles. If he fails, and Wasik argues that the success of the plan will depend on how effective his stimulus plan is in the next two years, he will be met with an unforgiving public.

Wasik explores how Obama’s programs will impact the public, how people can benefit from them and what investments should be considered. At a time when thoughtful dialogue is often replaced with angry mob-like shouting, Wasik helps us understand the challenges Obama faces trying to fix the broken economy he inherited.

How to Rebound from Last Year’s Financial Folly

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Here’s a piece I did for AARP Bulletin on new retirement savings tools:

http://bit.ly/7ZkdK

Will Obamanomics Work?

Monday, September 21st, 2009

This is a review from the conservative blog “Associated Content.” While I don’t agree with the author’s conclusion, it’s important to consider his point of view.

The Audacity of Help by John F. Wasik is a defense of President Obama’s economic policies, based on his campaign promises, the passage of the stimulus package, and the proposal of his first budget. It is not very convincing.

The main virtue of The Audacity of Help is that it contains a very detailed description of what President Obama proposes to do, with a rationale of why he proposes to do it. The Audacity of Help falls down where it attempts to persuade the reader that these new economic policies are
desirable. The reason for this is in the underlining assumptions surrounding those policies.

The first chapter of The Audacity of Help is a brief description of the New Deal, from a liberal point of view, and about how it allegedly saved capitalism by creating a government bureaucracy to “manage it.” The implication is that Barack Obama is FDR reborn, come to fix the alleged excesses of capitalism that were allowed to run rampant under President Reagan and President George W. Bush.

The problem is that modern scholarship on the New Deal suggests that it actually prolonged the Great Depression by stifling private, economic activity and causing uncertainty about government economic policy. If Barack Obama wants to make a second New Deal, which John F. Wasik calls “the Green Deal”, after some of the more environmental aspects of Obama economic policy, then we’re in trouble.

There is a lot of verbiage about how the economic stimulus package was supposed to work, with the “shovel ready jobs” and more spending on science and technology. The reality of the stimulus package, as we know now at the close of the seventh month of the Obama Presidency is that it has not stimulated anything but the growth of government and pork barrel spending.

Indeed, reading The Audacity of Help against the background of the open revolt by the American people, as manifested by the tea party protests and the town hall confrontations, one gets the impression of reading a document whose time has already passed and whose relevancy has been
destroyed by events. The question about Barack Obama’s economic policies is no long how they will help, but rather how much they will hurt before they are stopped and hopefully reversed.

Source: The Audacity of Help, by John F. Wasik, Bloomberg Press, 2009

The Zen of Audacity

Friday, September 18th, 2009

The following is review of Audacity from zenpundit.com:

The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America by John F. Wasik

Initially, I was reluctant to accept a review copy of The Audacity of Help because I blog primarily on military and national security issues and straight domestic politics posts tends to attract tiresome, angry, commenters who type in caps ( I do not want traffic, I want influential readers). Nor am I an expert on business or finance issues, Wasik’s forte as a journalist and an area best judged from a position of extensive personal experience, which I do not have. John Wasik though, after I checked him out, impressed me as an evenhanded and experienced reporter, so I accepted.

If you are a “political blogger”, Left or Right, order a copy of The Audacity of Help today, it’s an invaluable, factual ”scorecard” on the domestic agenda of the administration of President Barack Obama, especially the outcome stimulus package and the positions of all the players, executive vs. legislative, promises vs. reality and Democrat vs. Republican. The appendix and bibliographic resources alone will be fodder for many a blog post. Wasik offers a theme of “cui bono” from policy status quo or change that is refreshing and informative (and I say this as someone who would much rather write about Bernard Fall, the Haqqani Network or Herodotus than how Obamacare will impact senior citizens or the elections in 2010) accompanied by various textual, factoid, ”asides” that extend each chapter.

Here are the chapters of The Audacity of Help, which runs 202 pages:

1. First Aid and Income Boosters

2. Rebuilding Infrastructure, Creating Jobs,

3. Bottom Up Economics: Small-Business Benefits

4. Job Creators and the Green Collar Bonus

5. Get Smarter

6. Borrowing Wisely

7. Restoring Home Ownership: Keeping the Dream Alive

8. Health Care Reform

9. Unifinished Business: Long Range Goals in Entitlement Reform

10. The Road Ahead

I don’t agree with everything Wasik has to say in terms of policy but Wasik is measured in his praise and criticism on all parties and is ultimately, a fiscal realist (”How will all this money be paid back?”). He gives a fair hearing before offering his own opinions and policy recommendations toward the conclusion of the chapters which allows me to give Wasik the ultimate compliment to a writer of non-fiction:

The Audacty of Help is useful.

How Glenn Beck Can Become a Progressive

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

This is my latest piece from Huffington Post:

When I was on Glenn Beck’s Fox show a few months ago, I was apprehensive that he was going to malign me and the publisher of my columns. After a fairly mundane, fairly apolitical chat about the sorry state of the US home market, though, we both went our separate ways.

I’m not sure what motivates Beck, although if he’s paranoid about reds under his bed, he could find much better targets than Van Jones and the Apollo Alliance.

As I discovered researching my book The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America (www.audacityofhelp.net), Beck is right about one thing. The Apollo Alliance is part of a conspiracy. They want to create jobs, rebuild the inner city, pry kids away from gangs and make the US economy more energy efficient.

The Alliance’s stated goal (www.apolloalliance.org) is to invest “$500 billion over ten years to create 5 million green-collar jobs in a range of industries including renewable energy, energy efficiency, transit and transportation and research, development and deployment of cutting-edge clean energy technologies.”

There are some pretty suspect groups involved in the Alliance’s mission. Among them are the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club (I’m a member), United Steelworkers and the Center for American Progress. Guess what the agenda of these groups consist of: environmental protection, clean energy technology and job creation. How un-American is that?

Jobs and raising living standards and family income could be the theme of Beck’s shows, but he insists on creating phantom menaces where none exist. He could be railing against the soaring unemployment rate or the fact that the poverty rate rose last year to 13.2 percent from 12.5 percent in 2007.

Median household incomes fell the most in the first year of a recession since World War II. Chances are his viewers are falling back, not moving forward economically, but he chooses to blame the wrong people for their misfortune.

If Beck wants some worthy targets of his venom, he should start examining what a raw deal American taxpayers got for bailing out big banks and insurers. To date, financial institutions have received $239 billion out of the $700 billion TARP bailout fund. American International Group, Inc., which the government effectively took over, was given a $182 billion lifeline by the US Treasury and Federal Reserve. That was after their portfolios of unregulated complex derivatives and debt threatened to take down the global financial system.

Have bank fees come down, mortgage rates dropped to the banks’ cost of funds or insurance premiums declined for all of the government assistance we’ve given them?

The opposite has happened. The biggest banks got bigger, their toxic securities were snapped up by the government and bankers have tightened credit and raised fees on nearly every service. Derivatives are still unregulated and investment banks are printing money again, taking advantage of a system that could still collapse in a heap of computer-driven trades.

Private mortgage lending has gotten so abysmally stingy that the largest mortgage lenders are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — who account for some 80 percent of new loans — also seized by the government last year, which didn’t have much of a choice if it wanted to protect private investors.

If anything, the bailouts largely transacted by the GOP-dominated, free-market-loving Bush Administration have largely nationalized the largest insurer, mortgage insurance corporations, GM, Chrysler and most of the toxic debt that triggered last year’s financial pandemic. The most expensive financial debacle in history was seeded by libertarian “maestro” Alan Greenspan and his Wall Street honchos. Not a communist in sight there.

So why is a relatively small non-profit group like Apollo so threatening? What are they really up to?

To understand what Apollo stands for, Beck would be well served to interview people like Angela Hurlock, who is building green homes in South Chicago. She is not only running the Catholic non-profit Claretian Associates (www.claretianassociates.org) on a shoestring, she has built energy-producing homes and apartments and put people to work in a neighborhood ravaged by gangs and unemployment.

Beck also would’ve benefited from talking with David Irish Sullivan, who worked with Angela to create a park in a vacant lot and start a program to create work doing green housing. Originally a steelworker, Sullivan started to build eco-friendly homes when the domestic industry imploded in the early 1980s. He recently passed away, though.

I knew devastated mill neighborhoods all too well since I was a reporter in South Chicago at the time. Shortly after I had moved on, a young activist named Barack Obama also became intimately familiar with the economic violence that still batters places like South Chicago.

The work of the Apollo Alliance, Hurlock and Sullivan — and thousands of other unsung heroes — is the work of saints. Sadly, poverty and violence are growing in tandem in the world’s largest economy.

Just yesterday, an assistant principal at my daughter’s middle school told me that when the economy sags, gangs gain more members. Under the seduction of their evil enterprise, they offer children a way to make money in communities where youth unemployment is the norm. And this was at a middle-class school far from the city.

At the very least, Beck should take an honest look at what President Obama is proposing to do to remake the US economy as a global power in clean technology. His Green Deal is a great deal for our struggling economy.

We already have the social and intellectual infrastructure. Originally created to build bombs and promote nuclear energy, the US Department of Energy’s chain of national laboratories is producing breakthroughs in alternative energy, materials science and green building.
There are millions of people willing to learn new “green-collar” trades to upgrade buildings and create affordable housing. The real scandal is that we’re not using these invaluable resources to their fullest advantage.

What would happen if the US did a matching grant program for private enterprise to come up with clean-energy, low-cost transportation, long-term batteries, affordable green houses and exportable technology? A good number to start with would be the $700 billion earmarked for the TARP bailout.

But Beck and his tea-bagging minions apparently don’t want anything to do with creating jobs for those who need them. Meanwhile, the Chinese and Europeans are racing ahead to dominate the clean energy industry. They will succeed while we devote endless hours to bloviating on death panels, socialism, Sarah Palin and character assassination.

Here’s one last item to hasten Beck’s conversion: The People’s Republic of China is backing a massive, global effort to “own” green technology. Need I remind anyone that China is a communist country, Mr. Beck? Have you no decency, sir?

Audacity an “Impressive Read”

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

This is a review from Michele Malsbury on www.americanchronicle.com:

John F. Wasik, author of The Audacity Of Help, has written twelve other books and pens a regular column for Bloomberg News. He is a public speaker, and co-founder/president of Citizens for Action that is tasked with organizing people toward holding our government to being transparent and accountable for their actions and legislation. John Wasik has a personal blog regarding this book on www.audacityofhelp.net .If you would like to read more about Mr. Wasik you can do so by logging on to his personal web site at www.johnwasik.com or for information about his not-for-profit action group log on to www.citizensactionproject.org .

Mr. Wasik does not appear to favor any one of our political parties in his writing of The Audacity Of Help. Most of this book is dedicated to talking about what candidate Obama promised on the campaign trail and comparing that to what President Obama and congress are accomplishing thus far into his presidency. John Wasik tackles the questions about who wins/loses with regard to proposed legislation in the areas of energy, taxation, education, stimulus funding, and healthcare. His analogies are thorough and well researched. He points out which sectors may benefit investors in each proposal floated by this Administration and why he believes that to be the case.

This book traces the falling down of our economy back to specific incidents in 2008 beginning with Bear Strearns being absorbed by JPMorgan/Chase to nearly 8,500 homes being foreclosed per month that summer to Fannie and Freddie being taken over by the government to Lehman Brothers bankruptcy to the Bernake/Paulson three-page plan to un-freeze credit to massive jobs being lost month after month to what President Obama and congress are attempting to do to stop this downward spiral/depression from worsening. (2009, p.10-14) Mr. Wasik believes that the plans put into place under President Obama will need a couple of years to bear fruit.

Unlike previous President´s, President Obama´s economic plans hinge on “placing social concerns before the alter of economic expansion….and emphasize people-centered principles by focusing on healthcare and education…in order to show how social goals can be combined with capitalism….to create a culture of sharing and responsibility for the entire population.” (2009, p.18) Typically this type of economic planning is called bottom-up and varies greatly from the top-down proposals used by prior Presidents because in this form of economic reform [paraphrase] contends that the government is not the enemy [contrary to what the right says], but can be co-benefactor toward achieving better socio-economic goals for the sinking middle class, those on fixed incomes, and the poor.

Key to the success of this plan according to Mr. Wasik is flexibility of this Administration. He then said that “The way major project money is allocated will also determine how Obama´s policies could re-shape the United States….focuses on giving the lion´s share of the funds to cities and suburbs, then it could trigger a new focus on urban renewal….(2009, p.43) if the Green Deal succeeds on a large scale, it will employ millions in the building trades alone, perhaps offsetting the horrendous job losses of the last several years.” (p.77)

John Wasik states that [paraphrase] analysts and scholars compare The New Deal (Roosevelt) to what President Obama is doing now with regard to stabilizing our economy and creating jobs, but nobody can deny that under The New Deal four million jobs were created by 1934 and if President Obama can do the same he is going to be heralded as a great president. (2009, p.5) Mr. Wasik calls what President Obama is trying to do The Green Deal and says that it “means redefining connections between government investments and economic growth. (p.8)

Regardless of what party you affiliate yourself with this book should be a must read in helping to shape the direction of future arguments and/or discussions on the topics and issues of import to all of America at this tumultuous time. The premises and arguments are logically presented and researched and flow to well-founded conclusions. The tips for investment in the financial sector make good common sense for those of you with money to invest toward the long term economic growth of this country. Thank you Mr. Wasik for a very credible, timely, and impressive read.

What Went Wrong

Monday, September 14th, 2009

Here’s another excerpt from Audacity of Help:

What Went Wrong

Like FDR, Obama proposed a lofty agenda that will concentrate on creating employment and eventually economic security for working Americans. As a president who has a deep sense of history — it’s evident in his speeches, writing, and policy proposals — Obama stated in his Audacity of Hope that “today, the social compact that FDR helped construct is beginning to crumble.” Obama was distressed that job, retirement, and health security had been dismantled because the painful excesses of free-market policies wouldn’t protect the country in a global economy. European, Japanese, and Canadian workers don’t have to worry about their pensions or health care. In a global marketplace, Americans simply can’t compete with countries that have a better social safety net.

“If the guiding philosophy behind the traditional system of social insurance could be described as ‘We’re all in it together,’” he continues in Audacity, “the philosophy behind the Ownership Society seems to be ‘You’re on your own.’”

What had been sold as a panacea during the 1990s and the first decade of the twenty-first century, the market economy, blew up with the triple explosions of the dot-com, housing, and credit bubbles. Wall Street and bankers sold the myth that stocks and homes were guaranteed ways to wealth. Over the past thirty years, they convinced employers to dump hundreds of thousands of guaranteed, defined-benefit retirement plans for 401(k)-like plans, which subjected employees to unchecked market risk.

Homeowners wanting to participate in the American Dream by building home equity succumbed to the promise that adjustable-rate mortgages — which actually subjected them to the perils of credit markets — would create solid nest eggs. Entrepreneurs and, increasingly, corporate employees were hawked the idea of fending for themselves for health insurance, where they were effectively punished in the form of unaffordable rates for any preexisting conditions. Such was the big lie of the ownership society. It was the obverse of the New Deal philosophy. It was a raw deal.

Coupled with the myth that ordinary consumers could somehow make rational, informed decisions in an unpoliced market economy was the Nero-like fallacy during the Bush years that nothing was wrong with our energy infrastructure or climate. The surge in oil (to $147 a barrel) and gasoline ($4-plus per gallon) prices in the middle of 2008 showed how utterly senseless this policy had been. The popularity of former Vice President Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth, which won him both an Academy Award (for the movie version of his book) and a Nobel Prize for Peace, illuminated the folly of the Bush regime’s anti-environment policies. Hurricanes, cyclones, and precipitation cycles have become more intense. Drought and forest and wildfires ravage densely populated regions, causing famine, dislocation, and war.

The Bush administration’s criminal inattention to the victims of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 was emblematic of his disconnect from human reality (New Orleans is still a shell of its former self). It was pathological neglect like this that spurred much of the Obama Green Deal. Obama links a need for a new social compact with employment, education, and environmental concerns.

If most of his programs survive the contentious legislative process, Obama will have succeeded in reviving social capitalism, a blend of humanistic service, pragmatic government supervision, and some free-market principles. Better yet, if his initiatives excel in launching private-sector investments — and broad-based employment from inner cities to Silicon Valley — in clean energy, infrastructure, broad-band expansion, and exportable technologies, he may even be seen as a social or compassionate capitalist.

The Green Deal is the spiritual heir of the New Deal, only much more focused on creating an economy specifically rebuilt for the twenty-first century. After all, FDR never believed capitalism was dead, he only sought to build new institutions and preserve old ones that failed because of an over reliance on unfettered market forces. Although a stern critic of market forces, Obama is attempting to frame humanistic economics in a different light: government can work to create a stronger private sector while creating jobs, educating everyone, rebuilding our infrastructure, addressing climate change, and helping the poor.

The above is an excerpt from the book The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America by John F. Wasik. The above excerpt is a digitally scanned reproduction of text from print. Although this excerpt has been proofread, occasional errors may appear due to the scanning process. Please refer to the finished book for accuracy.

Copyright © 2009 John F. Wasik, author of i>The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America

“A Must Buy:” Black Men in America

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

This is a review from the Website “Black Men in America:”

Reviewed by Gary A. Johnson

What a timely book. The Audacity of Help by John F. Wasik is one of the most comprehensive books about Barack Obama’s Economic Plan and his vision for America. Wasik is no slouch. Unlike many so-called experts, Wasik is uniquely qualified to write this book having spent time studying and following President Obama for years.

Given all of the media attention to the President’s economic plan and the distortions and misrepresentations about the President and his policies, The Audacity of Help is a comprehensive and yet easy to understand breakdown of Barack Obama’s economic plan and challenges for America.

The Audacity of Help is like reading a history book. The author provides charts and blueprints about packages passed by Congress and allows you to understand the bills and what they really mean. Wasik also takes a look at how the President’s policies will affect health care, education, the environment and taxes.

Each chapter is clearly structured to show “what Congress passed,” and “who benefits most,” on issues such as Unemployment Insurance Benefits, COBRA, Home Energy Credits, Early Childhood Education, and more.

This book is no joke. It deals with issues that matter to all Americans.

For me the best part of the book are the thought-provoking questions. These questions forced me to think about the impact these policies will have on my family now and in the future. For example:

* How will it stimulate the worst economy in a generation?
* Who will gain?
* Who will lose?
* What are his plans for reviving public education, small business, the environment, credit reform, health care, homeownership and entitlement programs?
* Which industries will benefit?
* What new jobs will be created?

This book appears to leave no stone unturned as it also compares the President’s plan with the New Deal.

Honestly, reading the book I felt as if I was studying toward an economic degree and liking it. And I hate math and economics, but I could not put this book down. The current economic climate and the author’s knowledge about the economic plan are a great match.

When President Obama took office, banks were severely impaired, companies were cutting pensions, and market disruptions and unemployment left more than 45 million people without health insurance or retirement security.

The book end asking the $64,000 dollar question: Who will pay?

The soaring national debt begs the question: How will this money be paid back? According to author Wasik, the Obamanomics mission will ultimately lead to President Obama being judged on how well his can restore and maintain prosperity. Or in other words, how will he remake or preserve the American Dream.

If you want to understand what is going on with our country’s economy, THE AUDACITY OF HELP: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America (Bloomberg Press, August 2009), is a must-buy.

The Dark Future of US Healthcare

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

This is a guest blog on health care I did for Huffington Post following President Obama’s 9/9 speech to Congress:

If a meaningful health reform plan doesn’t pass, life in the U.S. will be inhumane and our country will begin to look like Great Britain after World War I — hobbled and facing unrelenting poverty.
As I discovered in researching my new book Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America (www.audacityofhelp.net), for an individual family, medical insurance now claims 20 percent of median income. That’s compared to 8 percent in 1987, according to the New America Foundation (http://www.newamerica.net), a progressive research organization in Washington.

“If we do not make health insurance more affordable,” states the Foundation in its ‘Next Social Contract’ report, “a majority of working Americans will be uninsured by 2020.”

Those who are worried about health care or medical bills are not productive members of society. We may have socialized medicine for the near-poor, unemployed and uninsured. But it’s the costliest and most inefficient care imaginable. Millions of pets receive better care.

Employers who don’t offer coverage are less competitive in a global marketplace. Uninsured workers end up in emergency rooms — or simply call 911 — demanding costly care that taxpayers will ultimately finance.

Aside from the numbers that are repeated ad nauseum, there is a darker reality brewing.

If nothing is done, life expectancies will drop in the U.S., more employers will go out of business and we will bankrupt ourselves while the Chinese and Indians create a clean energy industry, produce jobs, vacuum up global capital and raise their living standard. Uninsured and under-insured Americans visit doctors less frequently, pay more for care and have the highest rate of preventable deaths before age 75.

This Hobbesian vision springs to mind because we have failed to declare health care a basic human right. It should be an amendment to our constitution. Until we do that, you won’t have a moral/political basis for core principles. If Teddy Roosevelt, Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King were alive today, I’d bet they would agree with me.

President Obama’s health care speech last night was a mere template for reform, though, and not the actual article. The legislation we need has to come from a Congress willing to defy the status quo, insurance companies and show some leadership for the future.

Of course we need protection from the “pre-existing condition” and “drop you if you’re sick” scams the insurers have been getting away with for years. That should be the bedrock of any legislation.

Then there’s the flawed system that few have discussed: the lack of a strong cop over the insurance industry. Federal regulation is needed — a combination of the US Department of Justice and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Right now, weak state regulators not only turn a blind eye to the worst practices, they greenlight most rate increases. I know because I’ve been a victim of these abuses.

Insurers should also be held legally accountable for any abuses and should be prosecuted by effective watchdogs.

New federal regulation also can effectively create a national marketplace for insurance. At present, you can’t sell insurance across state lines. The companies like it that way because they often indirectly control state regulators and legislatures. They’d rather have 50 inspector Clouseaus watching them.

I’m not sure if President Obama’s “insurance marketplace” is the same thing as a national market pitting every insurer against each other to offer the best policy at the lowest price, but it should be.

Even so, the president’s “exchange” doesn’t kick in until 2013. In the interim, a high-risk pool will cover what the industry calls “uninsurable” policyholders. This is fraught with peril since state insurance pools can be unaffordable as well. I know people who’ve been in them. Small pools of sick people are rotten ideas. You have to spread risks around in a huge, diverse pool. And that’s what a national marketplace would do.

Independent commissions, which the White House has proposed, should seriously examine the fee-for-service system and study capping what providers charge in a public-private model.

As medical researcher Dr. Richard Moore stated in a recent paper: “there should be no profit in medical care. Doctors, nurses and technicians should be well paid, but no one should make a profit nor should any administrators receive those obscene salaries running up into the millions per year.”

If you consider health care to be an essential human service like a fire or police department, it makes no moral sense to make a profit from human suffering. Health care is civil, gender, age, disability and children’s rights all rolled into one issue. We can address this now. We all deserve better.

Author Bio
John F. Wasik, author of The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America, is the author of twelve books, including The Cul-de-Sac Syndrome and The Merchant of Power. He speaks widely and writes a weekly Bloomberg News column that reaches readers of five continents and which earned him the 2009 Peter Lisagor award for journalism. He lives in Chicago.
http://tiny.cc/tqiu6

“Required Reading for All Americans…”

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

This is a review from blogcritics.org:

The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America offers a journalist’s take on the compelling issues facing the 44th president of the United States, and the long road from campaign promise to reality.

Author John F. Wasik, a Bloomberg News columnist, brought this book out at lightning speed, encompassing an overview of Obama’s major campaign promises, pitted against their outcomes. The introduction includes a section on Obamanomics and a chronicle of Bush-Era Bust with a balanced explanation of the factors leading to recent issues such as “The Age of Froth Ends,” “Mortgage Madness” and “Reality Show Time.”

This is a lively and relevant look at the critical turning point in American history we’ve lived with in the past year. Wasik’s meticulous research in The Audacity of Help provides an analysis of all Obama’s major promises, then looks at what legislation was actually passed by Congress. Going further, the book shows who benefits most from various legislation, and what needs to be done next.

Obama’s promise to make college affordable is a prime example of the value of this book to consumers, business owners, and those who want more clarity that they get through news soundbites:

“While Obama proposed an American Opportunity Tax Credit of $4,000 toward free college education, Congress actually adopted that name for the former Hope Scholarship, offering only as much as $2,500/year, just through 2010. Eligibility stipulations include an income limit. Congress also did nothing to simplify the cumbersome financial aid process, which Obama promised to eliminate.”

Wasik is an expert on housing issues, as I recently reviewed here in his The Cul-de-Sac Syndrome: Turning Around the Unsustainable American Dream. As population growth forged ahead, homes became more elaborate and expensive. By 2006 an average of 37 percent of monthly income went to housing expenses. The realities of “house lust” meant people were no longer keeping up with their parents’ lifestyles and no longer able to stop the debt spiral.

In The Audacity of Help, Wasik skillfully weaves Obama’s policies and plans throughout an entire chapter entitled: “Restoring Home Ownership.” This should be required reading for all Americans interested in getting to the heart of the housing crisis.

All of Obama’s promises require capital, and Wasik looks at the obstacles, including the enormous political capital Obama needs to push his agenda along.

Wasik walks us through what a new economy agenda would look like and how it may reshape America. Top points are:

* People come first, not markets
* Corporate democracy is key
* Phantom wealth should be taxed
* A pluralistic partnership should displace patrimony and corporatocracy.

The progressive manifesto and bottom-up approach to lifting the middle class and poor up the economic scale can potentially motivate and mobilize an entire nation. Here, Wasik quotes Obama:

“Just as a family has to make hard choices about where to spend and where to save, so do we, as a government. There are times when you can afford to redecorate your house and there are times where you need to work on rebuilding its foundation. Today, we have to focus on foundations.”

http://tiny.cc/he9gX