Archive for August, 2009

Wasik Chosen in Essay Contest

Monday, August 31st, 2009

An essay I wrote on global warming was chosen to be included in an anthology on global warming entitled “Thoreau’s Legacy.” Here’s an article about it:

August 27, 2009

John Wasik of Grayslake is one of 67 Americans whose essays and photographs will be included in a new book on global warming.

The anthology titled Thoreau’s Legacy: American Stories About Global Warming tells what global warming means personally to Americans.

Wasik wrote an essay titled Counting Cranes that will be in Chapter VI of the new book, published by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) and Penguin Classics.

“Little things you do to help the environment add up,” Wasik said. “You can make a difference if you live simply.”

He said he felt honored to be selected for Thoreau’s Legacy: American Stories About Global Warming.

The competition to be included in the anthology was strong. Established and aspiring writers and photographers from across America sent in nearly 1,000 submissions. People submitted 200- to 500-word personal accounts or photographs that focused on the places they love and want to protect, and the steps they are taking in their own lives to stem the tide of global warming.

A team of reviewers from Penguin Classics and UCS selected 67 contributions for the anthology. They partnered with Mixit Productions to produce an interactive book. It is available free online at www.ucsusa.org/americanstories; as a free eBook at us.penguingroup.com/static/pages/ebooks/thoreauslegacy/index.html; or for $24.95 as a limited edition hardcover book at www.ucsusa.org/americanstories/buy-th-book.html.

Author Barbara Kingsolver wrote a forward on global warming for the book, where she said that “we must radically reconsider the power relationship between humans and our habitat.”

The anthology highlights the tradition of environmental writing embraced by Henry David Thoreau, who encouraged people to appreciate the world around them and to preserve it for future generations. The diverse contributors include scientists, students, grandparents, Native Americans, journalists, veterans, evangelical Christians, artists and businessmen.

For Wasik, his focus is on conserving our natural resources.

“I can’t say that global warming has been a passion (of mine), but conservation has been,” Wasik said. “We live in a conservation community — Prairie Crossing in Grayslake — where we have an organic farm and acres of open land and trails.”

He shares his passions through his writing.

“I’ve been an environmentalist most of my life and have written several books on the subject,” said Wasik.

His most recent book is titled The Cul-de-Sac Syndrome: Turning Around the Unsustainable American Dream. He has also written The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America, which addresses President Barack Obama’s plan to create “green” jobs.

Wasik heard about the Thoreau anthology through his membership in UCS, a science-based non-profit organization working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices and consumer choices, according to a release.

UCS partnered with Penguin Classics, a publisher committed to using paper products from manufacturers that follow sustainable paper production techniques and to in-house conservation and recycling.

– Marcia Sagendorph/For Pioneer Press

Obam’a’s Addiction?

Friday, August 28th, 2009

This is from the righttruth.typepad.com blog. I definitely don’t agree with or endorse this writer’s point of view, but in the interest of free speech and ensuring that my words are not taken out of context, I am presenting it here. The idea that Obama is a fascist/socialist or is any way abusive is ludicrous. For a balanced view of the Obama economic plan, see my new book Audacity of Help.

I don’t know why I didn’t notice it sooner, it seems to obvious now. Like all addicts, Barack Obama and his administration seem to hide their affliction from others, at least for a time. But the signs are clearly there for all to see. They don’t care about the physical or emotional consequences their habit has on others or themselves. Obtaining their object of their addiction is more important to them than anything else. Their affliction is making it difficult for them to function, it is impairing their judgment to a dangerous level, to the detriment of this nation and her future.

It’s not an addiction to drugs, or alcohol, or prescription medications, and I’m not talking about Obama’s addiction to the teleprompter or his addiction to cigarettes or his Blackberry — it’s an addiction to achieving their socialist and fascist agenda. Don’t believe me? Read the definitions:

Fascism: Fascists believe that nations and/or races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive by being healthy, vital, and by asserting themselves in conflict against the weak.[6]single-party state.[7] Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement.[8] Fascism opposes class conflict, blames capitalist liberal democracies for its creation and communists for exploiting the concept.[9] In the economic sphere, many fascist leaders have claimed to support a “Third Way” in economic policy, which they believed superior to both the rampant individualism of unrestrained capitalism and the severe control of state communism.[10][11] This was to be achieved by establishing significant government control over business and labour (Mussolini called his nation’s system “the corporate state”).[12][13] No common and concise definition exists for fascism and historians and political scientists disagree on what should be in any concise definition.[14] (more)

Socialism refers to various theories of economic organization advocating state, worker or public ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, and a society characterized by free and equal access to resources for all individuals with an egalitarian method of compensation.[1][2][3] Contrary to popular belief, Socialism is NOT a political system; it is an economic system distinct from capitalism.
Socialists mainly share the belief that capitalism unfairly concentrates power and wealth among a small segment of society that controls capital through exploitation, creates an unequal society, (more)

With the above definitions in mind, think about what the Obama administration has been pushing. Healthcare controlled by the government, with non-healthcare individuals serving on panels who will decide whether you are fit enough to live or die. They have taken over private companies which are not basically owed by the government. They are strictly anti-capitalistic when it comes to business. They believe in spreading the wealth (as long as it’s your wealth, not theirs).

We have been witnessing their increased irritability, agitation and anger while at times they are unusually calm and unresponsive. We’re told of regular screaming matches in the White House using vile language with members of the administration at odds with each other.

They have a lowered threshold for violence, specifically when it comes to the military, CIA, and defending this country. With the Obama followers we see similar symptoms including paranoia and delusions, however they seem to approve of violence when it suits their purposes and have no problem hiring thugs to carry out that violence.

Child abuse and neglect is much more common with addicts, which describes the Left perfectly as witnessed by their continues push to kill unborn babies and live-born babies that are not convenient for the mother — which takes neglecting a child’s basic needs (life) to the extreme.

Unlike with alcohol or drug abuse, there is no place for those hooked on fascism and socialism to go for help, even if they did recognize their problem and admit their need for help.

In the book Audacity of Help - Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America, by John F. Wasik, the author emphasizes what drives Obama is his “concept of economic equality”. Wasik says that “Fortunately, Obama is a uniquely qualified expert on economic violence” referring to Obama’s community organizing in Chicago. Wasik questions whether Obama will “…create a new form of government — guided by compassionate social capitalism otherwise known as Obamanomics?”

Addicts, when high on their drug of choice, often have visions of grandeur, seeing themselves as better than others, more qualified, on a higher level that others — perhaps with a messiah complex. They don’t want to be questioned or confronted with the truth. They believe that others are out to get them, even to the point of being paranoid.

Many times addicts inherit their addictions or are influenced by those close to them during their formative years. For many addicts there is no recovery. For the rest of us the only solution is to separate ourselves from these people. Remove them from their positions so they cannot influence others, so they cannot destroy our lives, our home, or our future. We must remove ourselves from them and them from us as quickly as possible.

I know I’ve said it before, but I’m more convinced today than ever. It’s an addiction:

Addicts know they have an addiction, they wake up in the morning with nothing else on their mind except getting their next fix, whether it’s a drink of alcohol, pills, or something they get IV or inhale. They love it, they crave it, they dwell on it, if possible they talk about it with other like-minded addicts, they surround themselves with people who share the same addiction. They are willing to sacrifice their families, their souls, their jobs, their futures …. Sound familiar?

One last comment from John Wasik: My interpretation of Obama’s agenda is that he is a compassionate social capitalist. He wants government to encourage the private sector to create jobs and programs that meet human needs. I think he’s made great strides in doing this, but those who want to call him names and smear him will only impede the country from achieving a more widespread economic recovery.

How Obama Fumbled Health Care

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

This is a piece I wrote recently that appeared on Huffington Post:

Foul. Turnover. Two strikes. No matter which overused sports metaphor you use to describe the Obama team’s handling of their health care reform agenda, it’s clear that the best one to date is “fumble!”

The most audacious health plan in two generations is sputtering thanks to really awful communication planning, a mixed and confusing message and poor defensive strategy.

Since I just finished researching and writing a book on Obama’s economic plan (The Audacity of Help), I can tell you he hasn’t clearly communicated the dollars and sense argument. Everyone knows that health care costs are going up and it’s not sustainable. But how much will his plan save the family of four, the single mother, the high-income household? Will there be any real savings at all when you figure in the costs of paying for it? That was the first blunder. Americans always vote with their wallets and the Obama crew missed this fact.

I’m sure that Obama’s team had an inkling of what they were up against in terms of a massive anti-lobbying campaign. Yet the disinformation blitzkrieg ranging from the loony Sarah Palin to the grannie “death panels” has not been fully dispersed. Not even close.

According to research by Bloomberg News, for every lawmaker in Congress, there are six health care lobbyists. That’s an army of 3,300 arm-twisters, back-biters and potential sources of re-election funds in the faces of our elected officials. There have been so many influence peddlers that an average of three lobbyists per day have been registering in Washington since July 1.

What has Obama’s team promised the heavy hitters in this cabal? He’s met with doctor, hospital and pharmaceutical groups in the White House. Did he promise to not reap cost savings on a large scale? Did he tamp down plans for a public option? Did he promise to keep the boondoggle that subsidizes drug prices and managed care in Medicare? He has not been forthcoming with those details and that hurts his credibility.

“The whole process is seedy and demonstrates cruel disregard for the millions of Americans who, whether in dire need of medical services or not, voted for ‘change we can believe in,’” wrote Ralph Nader in a recent column.

The sinister locomotive of this train wreck is the fee-for-service business model in the system. Few are talking about it and the industry doesn’t want to touch it. Hence the vicious counter-attack. If you’re a hospital, doctor, clinic or drug company why would you want government messing with this virtually unlimited source of income?

If you’re a doctor and own an MRI facility, you tell your patients to get scans because it directly benefits you. If you’re a pharmaceutical corporation, you want doctors and hospitals to use the latest — albeit most expensive — name-brand drugs. The last thing you want is a single-payer system or an amorphous “public option” plan negotiating huge discounts and doing studies that compare your heavily advertised product with generic equivalents.

If you’re an insurer, you loathe the idea of a public plan even more. Not turning away people who are really sick or burdened with “pre-existing conditions” means reduced profits and lower executive bonuses. After all, claims in insurance parlance are “losses.” Private insurers are in the business of investing money, not healing people.

Now that the White House seems to be backing off the public option, how will his plan reduce costs while protecting those with chronic conditions and those considered “uninsurable?” Not a week goes by when I don’t have a conversation with family or neighbors on how they will afford coverage if they lose a job or get seriously ill. I have the same fears myself.

To best battle the manic propaganda machine, the Obama team can get back into the game but needs to craft its defense and offense around three streamlined concepts:

Choice. You keep your doctor, hospital, Medicare and other providers. Maybe rebrand the entire plan as “iChoice.” Branding is everything and right now they have a mish-mash that confuses everyone.

Affordability. Whether working or not, poor or disabled, you won’t go broke paying for coverage — ever.

Universal. Everybody is covered. No questions asked.

To their credit, the White House team has attempted to combat the effluent of the disinformation campaign on their whitehouse.gov blog in a late-to-the-game spinoff www.WhiteHouse.gov/realitycheck.

Yet the Obama team’s pushback needs to be ferocious, clear and boiled down. How will the plan impact those with insurance through employers? Will it cost more or less over time? If the public option is dropped, how will those without employer-provided insurance obtain guaranteed, affordable coverage?

Is there any point to reform unless the more than 60 million uninsured and under-insured can be covered and not face bankruptcy? There should be some irrefutable part of the program that will prevent the 20,000 annual deaths of people who avoided life-saving medical care because they just couldn’t afford it.

©2009 John F. Wasik, author of The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America.

What Obama is Really Promising

Monday, August 24th, 2009

This is an excerpt from my new book:

The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America Excerpt from The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America

by John Wasik

Basic Obamanomics
Boiled down, what Obama promises is a more ecological sense of shared responsibility. By ecological, I’m referring to interrelationships within society and the economy and not just the environment. Green jobs for inner-city residents mean better education and opportunity. Reshaping the energy infrastructure translates into less dependence on foreign energy sources, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and lower home-ownership expenses. Can the more than $350 billion the U.S. spends annually on energy imports be rechanneled into domestic energy production and jobs? Obamanomics provides the impetus to transform the United States into a greener economy.

This new economy, in Obama’s plan, means redefining connections between government investments and economic growth. Spending money on health-record digitization, renewable energy, and general education will better position the United States to compete in global trade. More affordable and portable health care will create more economic security for everyone, particularly entrepreneurs.

Job creation and economic stimulation, naturally, topped the “to-do” list — in addition to a comprehensive bank bailout. The $787 stimulus plan passed by Congress, the focus of most of this book, was the first salvo. In his January 8, 2009, speech, when he introduced the main parts of his “American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan” (which I refer to throughout simply as the “stimulus” plan), he echoed FDR and laid the groundwork for his economic policy on the ruins of the ownership society and the botched bailouts of 2008:

If nothing is done, this recession could linger for years. The unemployment rate could reach double digits. our economy could fall $1 trillion short of its full capacity, which translates into more than $12,000 in lost income for a family of four. We could lose a generation of potential and promise, as more young Americans are forced to forgo dreams of college or the chance to train for the jobs of the future . . . . This crisis did not happen solely by some accident of history or normal turn of the business cycle, and we won’t get out of it by simply waiting for a better day to come, or relying on the worn-out dogmas of the past. We arrived at this point due to an era of profound irresponsibility that stretched from corporate boardrooms to the halls of power in Washington, DC . . . . Banks made loans without concern for whether borrowers could repay them, and some borrowers took advantage of cheap credit to take on debt they couldn’t afford. Politicians spent tax-payer money without wisdom or discipline, and too often focused on scoring political points instead of the problems they were sent here to solve. The result has been a devastating loss of trust and confidence in our economy, our financial markets, and our government.

The above is an excerpt from the book The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America by John F.Wasik. The above excerpt is a digitally scanned reproduction of text from print. Although this excerpt has been proofread, occasional errors may appear due to the scanning process. Please refer to the finished book for accuracy.

Copyright © 2009 John F. Wasik, author of The Audacity of Help: Obama’s Economic Plan and the Remaking of America

KoganPage Reviews Audacity

Friday, August 21st, 2009

This is a short review from Koganpage.com:

The Audacity of Help provides an in-depth assessment of the winners and losers in President Obama’s newly-signed economic stimulus package.

The US is currently facing its greatest economic crisis since the 1930s. President Obama has taken quick and decisive action to enact an economic stimulus package strong enough to address problems of historic proportions. But what does this new package really mean for American families, businesses, investors, taxpayers, as well as an international audience?

The Audacity of Help unrolls the blueprints and offers insights on how the economic stimulus package - as passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama - will affect healthcare, education, the environment, energy, taxes and more. The book includes analysis of sectors and industries that stand to benefit, as well as those that will not. The author’s conclusions are firmly grounded in a comprehensive and enlightened evaluation of the final economic package passed into law, and his analysis is underpinned by extensive research and interviews with experts from each of the relevant economic sectors.
BOOK DETAILS :

Paperback, 208 Pages, Dimensions 216 x 135 MM Language English.

Dr. Helen’s Effective Remedy

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

This is a piece from a blog written by Dr. Helen Smith of Knoxville, Tennessee, who was kind enough to mention Audacity of Help:

http://drhelen.blogspot.com/2009/08/invy-league-college-bust.html

Harvard, Ivys May Not Be Worth It

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

As I discuss in my “Audacity of Help,” the Obama Administration has done little to bring down the cost of college for the middle class. While expanding Pell Grants is helpful, total college expenses continue to climb. Here’s a Bloomberg News column I did today on the subject: www.bloomberg.com

The Audacity of Health Care Reform

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

The audacity of health care opposition on KALW media roundtable: http://www.yourcallradio.org/